MOORLACH UPDATE — Continuing and Deleting — September 9, 2014

For today’s Board agenda, seven items were continued and three items were deleted. Allow me to get a little technical. In the Board’s Rules of Procedure, in Rule 22, any member of the Board may direct the Clerk of the Board to delete or continue any item from the agenda, except those filed by another Board member, by Friday of the week preceding the meeting. It goes on to state that the originator of any item on the Board agenda, or the CEO on behalf of any department under his jurisdiction, may direct that their item be deleted or continued to a date certain, any time prior to the scheduled meeting.

When an item is continued or deleted, we are not usually informed about the specific reasons. Consequently, when a reporter calls to ask for the reason, as in the case below, I don’t always have the full back story. However, to assume that the Supervisors, as a whole, have requested a deletion or continuance is not an accurate claim to make. So I would argue with the selection of the title in the Voice of OC piece below. Personally, I’m frustrated that 25 percent of today’s agenda was impacted by these procedures. I try to come prepared for every meeting and to be ready to debate the issues. But, continuing and deleting is part of the process and you try to get used to it.

Supervisors Back Away From Pay Hike for Political Aides

By NICK GERDA Voice of OC

Orange County supervisors have abruptly backed away from a controversial proposal that would have hiked the top pay for supervisors’ chiefs of staff by more than $20,000 per year.

The proposal – which was originally scheduled for public consideration this morning before being deleted from the supervisors’ agenda – would have established, for the first time, job classifications and pay grades for political aides to county supervisors.

The move sparked criticism from the county’s main rank-and-file employees union, which questioned how there’s no money for rank and file raises but plenty of room for high-ranking political operatives.

The highest-level salary for chiefs of staff could have increased from about $112,900 to more than $131,000 under the proposal.

If enacted, the new policy would have supervisors’ most senior political aides join deputy sheriffs in securing a pay hike just after being required to pay into their own pensions.

The item’s deletion is related to an issue raised by County Counsel Nick Chrisos, said Supervisor John Moorlach.

“I guess they decided then to just go ahead and delete it,” Moorlach said last week, adding that he didn’t yet have further information about Chrisos’ reasoning.

The proposal was originally scheduled for a vote on Aug. 12.

The Friday before the meeting, Voice of OC reported that, among other things, the proposal solves a potential salary twist to the recent transfer of top executive Brian Probolsky from OC Community Resources into Supervisor Pat Bates’ office.

Probolsky, who also serves as an elected member of the Moulton Niguel Water District, took over as Bates’ chief of staff and as of last month earned $122,886 according to county officials — far above the salary limit of $112,881 currently in place for political aides.

Jennifer Muir, assistant general manager for the Orange County Employees Association, sent out a sharply worded message to her members opposing the proposal.

"The County workforce is divided into haves and have nots, insiders and outsiders, the favored few and everyone else," Muir wrote ahead of the Aug. 12 meeting.

Supervisor John Moorlach, meanwhile, noted last month that when he hired back one of his former political aides several years ago at a higher salary than authorized by county ordinance, he made up the difference out of his campaign account.

When it came time to debate the new job classification proposal on Aug. 12, it was delayed until Sept. 9.

Next week’s agenda was released last Wednesday and listed the item as being up for a vote. The staff report is available here.

But by late Thursday afternoon, the agenda’s revisions listed the item (no. 14) as deleted.

It’s unclear if there are plans to bring the item back for a vote at a future meeting.

You can reach Nick Gerda at ngerda, and follow him on Twitter: @nicholasgerda.

Disclaimer: You have been added to my MOORLACH UPDATE communication e-mail tree. In lieu of a weekly newsletter, you will receive occasional media updates, some with commentary to explain the situation, whenever I appear in the media (unless it is a duplication of a previous story).

I have two thoughts for you to consider: (1) my office does not usually issue press releases to get into the newspapers (only in rare cases); and (2) I do not write the articles, opinions or letters to the editor.

This message should appear at the bottom of every e-mail you receive. If these e-mails should stop arriving in your mail box, it will be because your address has changed and you did not provide a new one. If you do not wish to receive these e-mails, then please e-mail back and request to unsubscribe.

Advertisements